Hashmi v. Director, TDCJ
| Syed Hashmi |
| Director, TDCJ |
| 3:2024cv02011 |
| August 7, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:24-CV-2011-N-BT, 3:24-CV-2012-N-BK, 3:24-CV-2013-N-BK consolidated with lead case 3:24-CV-2009-N-BN. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 3:24-CV-2009-N-BN. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 8/14/2024) (kcr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge David C Godbey for all further proceedings. Judge Sam A. Lindsay no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 8/13/2024) (kcr)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Syed Hashmi (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Illich, Niles) |
| New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) (agc) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Syed Hashmi. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Illich, Niles) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Syed Hashmi. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $5; receipt number ATXNDC-14822742) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Brief in Support, #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s)) (Illich, Niles) (Main Document 1 replaced to flatten PDF on 8/8/2024) (agc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hashmi v. Director, TDCJ | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Syed Hashmi | |
| Represented By: | Niles S Illich |
| Represented By: | Mikayla Jade Lewison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
