PGJR LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company
PGJR, LLC |
OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY |
3:2024cv02313 |
September 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Ada Brown |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Tillman, Mark) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14911476) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Dallas County Case Information Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Index of All Documents File in State Court, #3 Exhibit(s) B-1: Plaintiffs Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) B-2: Citation issued to Enrique Tudon, #5 Exhibit(s) B-3: Citation issued to Liberty Mutual Insurance, #6 Exhibit(s) B-4: Citation issued to Ohio Security Insurance Company, #7 Exhibit(s) B-5: Return of Service Liberty Mutual Insurance, #8 Exhibit(s) B-6: Return of Service Enrique Tudon, #9 Exhibit(s) B-7: Return of Service Ohio Security Insurance Company, #10 Exhibit(s) B-8: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Ohio Security Insurance Company, and Enrique Tudons Original Answer to Plaintiffs Original Petition, #11 Exhibit(s) B-9: Plaintiffs Notice of Partial Dismissal, #12 Exhibit(s) B-10: Order Granting on Plaintiffs Notice of Partial Dismissal, #13 Exhibit(s) C: Texas Secretary of State Business Organizations Inquiry for Plaintiff, #14 Exhibit(s) D: Plaintiffs June 6, 2024 pre-suit notice, #15 Exhibit(s) E: Plaintiffs September 9, 2024, First Demand for Payment of Appraisal Award, #16 Cover Sheet, #17 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Tillman, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PGJR LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | Salina A Kabani |
Represented By: | Mark D Tillman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: PGJR, LLC | |
Represented By: | Elan A Cabrero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.