Jackson v. The State of Texas, City of Dallas
| Lazell D Jackson, Sr |
| The State of Texas, City of Dallas and NFN Stephens |
| 3:2024cv02334 |
| September 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL filed by Lazell D Jackson, Sr. (kcr) Modified on 10/30/2024 (chmb). |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and assessing a partial filing fee in amount of $32.00 with a balance of $318.00 remaining. No process will issue pending completion of screening. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 10/22/2024) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Tue Oct 22 10:48:59 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Lazell D Jackson, Sr. (ndt) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against The State of Texas, City of Dallas, NFN Stephens filed by Lazell D Jackson, Sr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
| Filing 11 Public correspondence filed, deputy clerk response attached, received from Lazell D Jackson, Sr. (kcr) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Lazell D Jackson, Sr re: 9 Order And Notice of Deficiency with Deputy Clerk Response. (knb) |
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY. Plaintiff Lazell D. Jackson, Sr., must address the following deficiency: The complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis were not filed on the appropriate form. See N.D. Tex. Misc. Ord. 14 (requiring inmates to file civil rights complaints and motions to proceed in forma pauperis on the court-approved forms). Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to (1) file a civil rights complaint on the court-approved form, and (2) pay filing and administrative fees of $405.00 or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the court-approved form with the required certificate of inmate trust account, by October 21, 2024. See Complaint form at page 2, paragraph 3 for filing fee information under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b).The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide to Plaintiff, with service of this Order, a prisoner civil rights complaint form (labeled amended and reflecting this case number) and a prisoner form motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Any amended complaint will supersede (take the place of) the previous filing. Consequently, Plaintiff must state all claims and list all defendants in any amended complaint filed. No process will issue except upon order of the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/18/2024) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process shall be withheld pending completion of judicial screening, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until the Court enters a scheduling order, (4) no amendments or supplements to the complaint shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 9/18/2024) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8, 9, a prisoner civil rights complaint form (labeled amended and reflecting this case number) and a prisoner form motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Wed Sep 18 15:23:12 CDT 2024 (crt) Modified text on 9/18/2024 (agc). |
| Filing 7 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (agc) |
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 9/16/2024) (nht)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee Ann Reno on 9/16/2024) (nht)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. and NEF of NEW CASE NUMBER entry Mon Sep 16 15:12:05 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| NEW CASE NUMBER 3:24-cv-02334-K Jackson v. The State of Texas, City of Dallas has been opened following the order of transfer entered in case number 2:24cv0201-Z. Future filings should reflect only the new case number and be directed to the proper division (see LR 5.1(a)). Clerk to complete new case processing and mail notice of this entry to any party who did not receive it electronically. (ldm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Mon Sep 16 11:44:09 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against The State of Texas, City of Dallas filed by Lazell D Jackson, Sr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (nht) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (Attachments: #1 General Order Concerning Litigation) (nht) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Reno (see Special Order 3). No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Reno). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (nht) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. (Copy of 1st page of Complaint also mailed to Plaintiff) Fri Sep 13 13:39:35 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
