Mitchell v. Blinken
| Adrian Mitchell |
| Antony J Blinken |
| 3:2024cv02498 |
| October 4, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Brantley Starr |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***DISREGARD/DUPLICATE ENTRY***Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Eastern District of Texas as case number 4:24-cv-00927. (ykp) Modified on 10/18/2024 (ykp). |
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Eastern District of Texas as case number 4:24-cv-00927. (ykp) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Oct 17 08:46:06 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 6
Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Sherman Division Division of Eastern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 10/16/2024) (cfk)
|
| Interdistrict Transfer to Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division. (cfk) |
| Filing 5 Court Request for Recusal: Magistrate Judge David L. Horan recused pursuant to Special Order 3-346. Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford assigned for matters that may be referred in this case. (agc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Oct 7 08:42:20 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Adrian Mitchell. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (ndt) |
| Filing 3 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Adrian Mitchell. (Filing fee $405.00; receipt number 300014217) (ndt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Oct 4 15:20:39 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. Blinken | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Antony J Blinken | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adrian Mitchell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
