Hines v. Crews et al
| Steven Hines |
| Kerry Crews, NFN Bailey, Shift Supervisor, Commerce Police Department and NFN Morgan |
| 3:2024cv02540 |
| October 8, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| David L Horan |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Stayed per #9 Order. (kaf) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8, 9. and to Inmate Trust Fund Hunt County Jail Tue Oct 15 09:58:57 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 9
ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING ACTION: The Court STAYS and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSES this case and instructs Plaintiff Steven Hines (1) that he must file a motion to reopen the case within 60 days after entry of judgment in the applicable state criminal court case and (2) that the failure to do so may result in the dismissal without prejudice of this case for failure to prosecute and/or comply with an order of the Court. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 10/11/2024) (agc)
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Hines shall pay $350.00, the balance of the filing fee, in monthly installments as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). After payment of the initial partial filing fee, if any, the agency having custody of Hines shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to Hiness inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis provided the account exceeds $10.00. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. If the inmate is housed in a Residential Reentry Center - RRC, Clerk to mail to mail this order to the Director of Corrections at the address of the petitioner.; denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 10/11/2024) (agc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Thu Oct 10 10:08:55 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Trust Account by Steven Hines TDCJ # 58715. (ndt) |
| Filing 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Steven Hines re #3 Complaint. (ndt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Steven Hines. (ndt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven Hines. (ndt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against NFN Bailey, Commerce Police Department, Kerry Crews, NFN Morgan, Shift Supervisor filed by Steven Hines. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (ndt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.