Jackson v. State of Texas et al
| Paul Douglas Jackson |
| Jane Doe, Gary Stephens, John Doe, Tracy Holmes, State of Texas, Craig Watkins and Faith Johnson |
| 3:2024cv02727 |
| October 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Brian McKay |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 12/10/2024) (ykp)
|
Filing 8
ORDER ACCEPTING #7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiffs Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF No. #4 ] is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 12/10/2024) (ykp)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Tue Dec 10 15:56:04 CST 2024 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Nov 4 09:38:06 CST 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Findings and Recommendations on Motion: The Court should DENY Jackson's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, received on October 29, 2024 (Dkt. No. #4 ), and dismiss his case without prejudice unless he pays the $405.00 filing fee by December 2, 2024, or by some other deadline established by the Court. A copy of this report and recommendation will be served on all parties in the manner provided by law. Any party who objects to any part of this report and recommendation must file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 11/1/2024) (ndt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Wed Oct 30 15:03:14 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Paul Douglas Jackson. (knb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Paul Douglas Jackson. (knb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Paul Douglas Jackson. (knb) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Jane Doe, John Doe, Tracy Holmes, Faith Johnson, State of Texas, Gary Stephens, Craig Watkins filed by Paul Douglas Jackson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (knb) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (knb) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge McKay (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge McKay). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (knb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.