Yang v. Roper et al
Plaintiff: Siyu Yang
Defendant: Jonathan Sanford, Matthias Vorwerk, Gregory Roper, Miguel (Augustus) Kelley and Santiago McMunn
Case Number: 3:2024cv03019
Filed: December 3, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2025 Filing 18 Second OBJECTION to #15 Findings and Recommendations by Siyu Yang (Yang, Siyu) Modified text on 1/30/2025 (axm).
January 21, 2025 USCA Case Number 25-10183 in USCA5 for #14 , #16 Notice of Appeal filed by Siyu Yang. (axm)
January 17, 2025 Filing 17 Transcript Order Form: re #16 Notice of Appeal, transcript not requested Reminder: If the transcript is ordered for an appeal, Appellant must also file a copy of the order form with the appeals court. (cfk)
January 17, 2025 Filing 16 (AMENDED) NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Judgment, to the Fifth Circuit by Siyu Yang. Filing fee $605, receipt number ATXNDC-15182397. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (cfk)
January 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court should deny the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion (Dkt.No. #13 ). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 1/16/2025) (cfk)
January 13, 2025 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Fifth Circuit by Siyu Yang. Filing fee $605, receipt number ATXNDC-15182397. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (Yang, Siyu) (Main Document 14 replaced on 1/15/2025 to flatten pdf) (axm).
December 23, 2024 Filing 13 First MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by Siyu Yang with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Yang, Siyu)
December 23, 2024 Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Siyu Yang. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Yang, Siyu)
December 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 JUDGMENT - This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this lawsuit is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/18/2024) (chmb)
December 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Objections were filed. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Objections are without merit and are hereby OVERRULED. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/18/2024) (chmb)
December 17, 2024 Filing 9 OBJECTION filed by Siyu Yang re: #7 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #4 Complaint filed by Siyu Yang. (Yang, Siyu)
December 17, 2024 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Santiago McMunn, #2 Additional Page(s) Matthias Vorwerk, #3 Additional Page(s) Jonathan Sanford, #4 Additional Page(s) Gregory Roper) (Yang, Siyu)
December 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss this lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 12/6/2024) (kaf)
December 6, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Dec 6 09:16:28 CST 2024 (crt)
December 4, 2024 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Miguel (Augustus) Kelley, Santiago McMunn, Gregory Roper, Jonathan Sanford, Matthias Vorwerk. (knb)
December 4, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3, 6 (Manual Raised Summons mailed). Wed Dec 4 10:34:42 CST 2024 (crt) Modified text on 12/4/2024 (knb).
December 3, 2024 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Siyu Yang. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (knb)
December 3, 2024 Filing 4 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Miguel (Augustus) Kelley, Santiago McMunn, Gregory Roper, Jonathan Sanford, Matthias Vorwerk filed by Siyu Yang. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number 300015154) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (knb)
December 3, 2024 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (knb)
December 3, 2024 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (knb)
December 3, 2024 Filing 1 **DISREGARD** New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (knb) Modified text on 12/4/2024 (knb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yang v. Roper et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Siyu Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthias Vorwerk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Roper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel (Augustus) Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santiago McMunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?