Liberty Steel Holdings USA Inc v. Express Scripts Inc
| Liberty Steel Holdings USA Inc |
| Express Scripts Inc |
| 3:2024cv03138 |
| December 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Express Scripts Inc. (cfk) |
| Filing 6 Combined Request for Clerks Entry of Default and MOTION for Default Judgment against Express Scripts Inc filed by Liberty Steel Holdings USA Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order Clerk's Entry of Default) (Vera, Efrain) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Express Scripts Inc ; served on 12/31/2024. (Vera, Efrain) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Express Scripts Inc. (agc) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Liberty Steel Holdings USA Inc.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Vera, Efrain) (Main Document 2 replaced to flatten PDF on 12/16/2024) (agc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Express Scripts, Inc filed by Liberty Steel Holdings USA Inc.. (Filing Fee $405.00. Receipt Number ATXNDC-15129507) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) No. 1, #2 Cover Sheet) (Vera, Efrain) (Attachment 2 replaced to flatten PDF on 12/16/2024) (agc). Modified text on 1/29/2025 (agc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Liberty Steel Holdings USA Inc v. Express Scripts Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Liberty Steel Holdings USA Inc | |
| Represented By: | Efrain Vera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Express Scripts Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
