Monroe v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff: Isaac Monroe
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Case Number: 3:2025cv01463
Filed: June 9, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ada Brown
Referring Judge: David L Horan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 THIRD ORDER REGARDING SERVICE: The Court reminds Monroe that by 12/17/2025, he must file with the Court proof of service on Defendant TDCJ, through TDCJ's Director (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 10/20/2025) (kcr)
October 20, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Mon Oct 20 14:30:26 CDT 2025 (crt)
October 7, 2025 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Attorney General; served on 9/8/2025. (cfk)
September 19, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Fri Sep 19 09:18:21 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SECOND ORDER REGARDING SERVICE: On 6/10/2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff Isaac Monroe, proceeding pro se, to serve Defendant Texas Department of Criminal Justice and file proof of service with the Court by no later than 9/8/2025. By 12/17/2025, Plaintiff Monroe must file with the Court proof of service on Defendant Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The Court further CAUTIONS Plaintiff Isaac Monroe that, if proper service is not shown to the Court through a filed proof of service (or waiver of service obtained and filed with the Court) by the specified deadline, this case, as to Defendant Texas Department of Criminal Justice, is subject to dismissal without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 9/18/2025) (ykp)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER ON FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/11/2025) (kcr)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER ON FILING MATERIALS UNDER SEAL. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/11/2025) (kcr)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING SERVICE: The Court further advises Monroe that, if proper service is not made and shown to the Court through a filed proof of service (or a waiver of service obtained and filed with the Court) before the 90th day after the filing of this action (on June 9, 2025) that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday which will be Monday, 9/8/2025 this case is subject to dismissal without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/11/2025) (kcr)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING COURT'S EXPECTATIONS FOR PARTIES. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/11/2025) (kcr)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER REGARDING USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/11/2025) (kcr)
June 11, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Wed Jun 11 09:37:50 CDT 2025 (crt)
June 10, 2025 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Texas Department of Criminal Justice. (knb)
June 10, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2, 6. Tue Jun 10 11:10:51 CDT 2025 (crt)
June 9, 2025 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Isaac Monroe. (knb)
June 9, 2025 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Isaac Monroe. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (knb)
June 9, 2025 Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Texas Department of Criminal Justice filed by Isaac Monroe. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number 300018219) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (knb)
June 9, 2025 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (knb)
June 9, 2025 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (knb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monroe v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Isaac Monroe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?