Jones v. Ellis County, Texas
| Wilbert Jones |
| Ellis County, Texas |
| 3:2025cv01651 |
| June 27, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Request to Appoint Counsel filed by Wilbert Jones. (kcr) |
| Filing 7 ANSWERS TO #6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Wilbert Jones. (kcr) |
Filing 6
Judge's Questionnaire sent to Wilbert Jones. Responses due by 9/22/2025. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 8/22/2025) (cfk)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Aug 22 15:01:09 CDT 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Upon consideration, Wilbert' Jones's #4 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. No process will issue pending completion of judicial screening. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. If the inmate is housed in a Residential Reentry Center - RRC, Clerk to mail to mail this order to the Director of Corrections at the address of the petitioner. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 8/13/2025) (chmb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Wilbert Jones. (kcr) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Ellis County, Texas filed by Wilbert Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kcr) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Jun 27 14:05:07 CDT 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Ellis County, Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wilbert Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ellis County, Texas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
