Meadows v. Smart Communications Inc
| Joshua James Meadows |
| Smart Communications Inc |
| 3:2025cv01969 |
| July 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in the Middle District of Florida as case number 6:25-cv-01612. (ykp) |
| Interdistrict Transfer to Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. (kcr) |
| Filing 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #3 Complaint by Plaintiff Joshua James Meadows. (knb) |
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: this case will be transferred the Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida on 8/21/2025. This case is stayed for 21 days pursuant to LR 62.2, clerk to calendar a reminder to transfer the case when the 21-day stay has elapsed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/31/2025) (kcr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Jul 31 08:47:07 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Jul 30 11:18:00 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Joshua James Meadows. (kxm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Smart Communications Inc filed by Joshua James Meadows. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Meadows v. Smart Communications Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua James Meadows | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Smart Communications Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.