Meadows v. Smart Communications Inc
Plaintiff: Joshua James Meadows
Defendant: Smart Communications Inc
Case Number: 3:2025cv01969
Filed: July 29, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Ed Kinkeade
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2025 Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in the Middle District of Florida as case number 6:25-cv-01612. (ykp)
August 21, 2025 Interdistrict Transfer to Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. (kcr)
August 19, 2025 Filing 6 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #3 Complaint by Plaintiff Joshua James Meadows. (knb)
July 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: this case will be transferred the Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida on 8/21/2025. This case is stayed for 21 days pursuant to LR 62.2, clerk to calendar a reminder to transfer the case when the 21-day stay has elapsed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/31/2025) (kcr)
July 31, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Jul 31 08:47:07 CDT 2025 (crt)
July 30, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Jul 30 11:18:00 CDT 2025 (crt)
July 29, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Joshua James Meadows. (kxm)
July 29, 2025 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Smart Communications Inc filed by Joshua James Meadows. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm)
July 29, 2025 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm)
July 29, 2025 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meadows v. Smart Communications Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua James Meadows
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smart Communications Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?