Roberson v. RS Clark & Associates Inc
| Edward Roberson, III |
| RS Clark & Associates Inc |
| 3:2025cv02273 |
| August 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:25-cv-2272-B, 3:25-cv-2273-B, 3:25-cv-2274-B consolidated with lead case 3:25-cv-2270-B. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 3:25-cv-2270-B. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/5/2025) (axm)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jane J Boyle for all further proceedings. Judge Ed Kinkeade no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/4/2025) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER: This Court requires the appearance of local counsel "where an attorney appearing in the case does not reside or maintain the attorney's principal office in this district." L. Civ. R. 83.10. Plaintiff's counsel, Andrew Woods II, lists an office address that is located in the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. However, this address appears to be a postal box, not a physical office. If true, Plaintiff is required to have local counsel pursuant to Rule 83.10(a).The Court will allow Mr. Woods to file an affidavit by September 5, 2025, swearing either that he principally resides in this District, specifically listing his residential address, OR that his principal office is located in this District and is not a virtual office or postal box. Mr. Woods is permitted to file this affidavit under seal if he identifies his residential address.If Mr. Woods cannot file said affidavit, Plaintiff shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel who satisfies the requirements of Local Civil Rule 83.10(a) by September 16, 2025. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/26/2025) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This Order governs requests to file materials in this case under seal. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/25/2025) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC STANDING ORDER: This Court requires all counsel of record to review and comply with the undersigned's Judge Specific Requirements as well as the Local Civil Rules for the Northern District of Texas upon making an appearance in a matter before this Court. These can be found at # Judge Specific Requirements and # Local Civil Rules . Further, counsel shall refer to this Court's Judge Specific Requirements and the Local Civil Rules prior to calling chambers with any questions. The Court calls specific attention to Local Civil Rule 7.2(f), which addresses the disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence, and Local Civil Rule 83.10, which address the requirement of local counsel. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/25/2025) (chmb)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to RS Clark & Associates Inc. (kcr) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Edward Roberson, III. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Woods, James) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Edward Roberson, III. (Woods, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against RS Clark & Associates Inc filed by Edward Roberson, III. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-15771375) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Woods, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roberson v. RS Clark & Associates Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edward Roberson, III | |
| Represented By: | James Andrew Woods, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RS Clark & Associates Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
