Stapleton v. Mihm
Plaintiff: Fransohn Stapleton
Defendant: Judge Michael Mihm
Interested Party: Ronee Williams
Case Number: 3:2025cv02413
Filed: September 3, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David L Horan
Referring Judge: Brantley Starr
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2025 Case transferred from NDTX has been opened in Central District of Illinois as case number 2:25-CV-2261. (kcr)
September 26, 2025 Interdistrict Transfer to Central District of Illinois; notice sent via email. All documents available electronically. If receiving court cannot upload, documents are available from PACER (record does not contain restricted documents). Counsel advised to file future documents in Central District of Illinois. (axm)
September 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Urbana Division of Central District of Illinois. This case is stayed for 21 days pursuant to LR 62.2, clerk to calendar a reminder to transfer the case when the 21-day stay has elapsed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 9/11/2025) (cfk)
September 11, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Sep 11 09:08:32 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 9, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Tue Sep 9 16:27:12 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 3, 2025 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Michael Mihm filed by Fransohn Stapleton. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ykp)
September 3, 2025 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (ykp)
September 3, 2025 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stapleton v. Mihm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fransohn Stapleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Michael Mihm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Ronee Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?