Gallegos v. DSM Trucking LLC et al
| David Gallegos |
| William Lee Wards and DSM Trucking LLC |
| 3:2025cv02497 |
| September 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Trial set for one week docket beginning on 10/26/2026 before Senior Judge David C Godbey. (Ordered by Senior Judge David C Godbey on 12/5/2025) (kcr)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT Rule 26(f) filed by David Gallegos. (Armstrong, Ronald) |
Filing 10
ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order regarding the following matters, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties position. (Ordered by Senior Judge David C Godbey on 10/27/2025) (frw)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by DSM Trucking LLC, William Lee Wards. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Clinton V Cox, IV added to party DSM Trucking LLC, William Lee Wards(pty:dft) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to DSM Trucking LLC ; served on 10/16/2025. (Armstrong, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to William Lee Wards ; served on 10/15/2025. (Armstrong, Ronald) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to DSM Trucking LLC, William Lee Wards. (knb) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge McKay). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (knb) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons as to Defendant William Lee Wards filed by David Gallegos. (Armstrong, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons as to Defendant DSM Trucking, LLC filed by David Gallegos. (Armstrong, Ronald) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by David Gallegos. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Armstrong, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by David Gallegos. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-15838546) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Armstrong, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.