Origin GPS Ltd v. Texas Instruments Inc
| Origin GPS Ltd |
| Texas Instruments Inc |
| Texas Instruments Inc |
| Origin GPS Ltd |
| 3:2025cv02596 |
| September 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Brian McKay |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Compliance with General Order 62 3-1 filed by Origin GPS Ltd (Zito, Joseph) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Seth Reich, Jr on behalf of Texas Instruments Inc. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Reich, Robert) |
Filing 19
ORDER ON LOCAL COUNSEL: The deadline has passed, and Defendant has not complied with the order. Defendant is ORDERED to comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) and the November 21, 2025 order no later than December 26, 2025. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 12/17/2025) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 18 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 4/23/2026. Amended Pleadings due by 4/23/2026. Discovery Deadline on Claim-Construction Issues due by 6/10/2026. Deadline for mediation is on or before 8/26/2026. Claim-Construction (Markman) Hearing set for 8/18/2026 in US Courthouse, Courtroom 1566, 1100 Commerce St., Dallas, TX 75242-1310 before US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 12/17/2025) (mcrd) |
| Filing 17 Joint STATUS REPORT and Proposed Scheduling Plan filed by Origin GPS Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Attachment A - Proposed Schedule) (Deming, Benjamin) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Counterclaim filed by Origin GPS Ltd. Related document: #11 Answer to Complaint,,, Counterclaim,, (Zito, Joseph) |
Filing 15
ORDER REQUIRING CONFERENCE AND JOINT STATUS REPORT: Joint Status Report and Proposed Scheduling Plan due by 12/16/2025. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 11/21/2025) (knb)
|
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Civil Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel in any case in which "an attorney appearing in a case does not reside or maintain the attorney's principal office in" the Northern District of Texas even where an attorney resides or maintains the attorney's principal office outside the Northern District of Texas but within 50 miles of the courthouse in the division in which the case is pending in this district (here, the Dallas Division)."Local counsel" means an attorney who (1) is a member of the bar of (that is, is admitted to practice in) the Northern District of Texas, (2) resides or maintains the attorney's principal office in the Northern District of Texas, and (3) has a residence or principal office that is located within 50 miles of the courthouse in the division in which the case is pending.Attorneys who are subject to Local Civil Rule 83.10(a) and wish to proceed without local counsel must obtain leave from the presiding judge by filing a motion for leave to proceed without local counsel.By December 12, 2025, Defendant Texas Instruments Incorporated must file one of the following: a response to this order, demonstrating why counsel is not subject to, or is exempt from, Local Civil Rule 83.10(a)'s requirements or pointing out how and when local counsel has previously been designated; under Local Civil Rule 83.10(a), a motion for leave to proceed without local counsel; or a designation of, and the entry of appearance by, of local counsel satisfying Local Civil Rule 83.10(a)'s requirements and stating local counsel's address and telephone number, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) and including the information that Local Civil Rule 10.1(b) requires. (And a designated local counsel who is not admitted to practice in this District and has not been admitted pro hac vice in this case must, at the same time, either become admitted to practice in this District, see Local Civil Rule 83.7, or move the Court to be admitted pro hac vice, see Local Civil Rule 83.9(b).) (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 11/21/2025) |
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay for pretrial management. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 11/20/2025) (cfk)
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Texas Instruments Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Abraham, Amanda) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Texas Instruments Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge., COUNTERCLAIM against Origin GPS Ltd filed by Texas Instruments Inc (Abraham, Amanda) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The deadline for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint is November 19, 2025. No further extensions will be granted. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 10/8/2025) (cea)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Texas Instruments Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)Attorney Amanda Aline Abraham added to party Texas Instruments Inc(pty:dft) (Abraham, Amanda) |
| Filing 8 Case reassigned to Judge Sam A. Lindsay per Special Order 3. Senior Judge David C Godbey no longer assigned to the case. (rekc) |
| Filing 7 Case reassigned to Senior Judge David C Godbey. Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater no longer assigned to the case per Special Order 3. (axm) |
| Filing 6 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to [email protected]. (cfk) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Texas Instruments Inc. (cfk) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge McKay). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Report on Filing of an Action to USPTO filed by ORIGIN GPS, LTD. (Deming, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by ORIGIN GPS, LTD.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Deming, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC. filed by ORIGIN GPS, LTD.. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-15866398) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - US Patent 10,037,300, #2 Exhibit(s) B - US Patent 10,353,854, #3 Exhibit(s) C - Claim Chart 300 Patent, #4 Exhibit(s) D - Claim Chart 854 Patent, #5 Cover Sheet) (Deming, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.