Zamora v. Farmers Insurance et al
| Ruby Sue Zamora |
| Farmers Insurance and Brian Scott |
| 3:2025cv03206 |
| November 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Labor: Labor/Management Relations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF TRANSFER: Order transferring case to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/26/2025) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER: Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process shall be withheld pending completion of judicial screening, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until the Court enters a scheduling order, (4) no amendments or supplements to the complaint shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 11/26/2025) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Nov 26 10:01:06 CST 2025 (crt) |
| Case copied to 4:25-cv-1335. Transfer to Fort Worth Division complete; clerk to set Related Case hyperlink, clear unnecessary flags, etc. (rekc) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ruby Sue Zamora. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (kcr) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ruby Sue Zamora. (kcr) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Farmers Insurance, Brian Scott filed by Ruby Sue Zamora. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kcr) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Nov 21 15:00:37 CST 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
