Kinney v. Securus Technologies
| Tramaine Collin Kinney |
| Securus Technologies |
| 3:2025cv03345 |
| December 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Renee Harris Toliver |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ELECTRONIC ORDER: On February 18, 2026, the judgment of the Court was entered dismissing Plaintiff's claims as barred by the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Docs. #11 , #12 . Subsequently, the Court received Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time, which although docketed on February 25, 2026, is deemed filed under the prisoner mailbox rule on the date Plaintiff submitted it to prisoner officials for mailing--February 17, 2026. Doc. #13 at 1. The motion seeks "one more extension of 30 days...." Doc. #13 at 1. Although the motion does not indicate the deadline Plaintiff seeks to extend, the Court liberally construes it as seeking another extension of the deadline to file objections to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed December 18, 2025. Doc. #6 . On Plaintiff's motion, the Court previously extended that deadline to object from January 2, 2026, to February 13, 2026. Doc. 10 . However, Plaintiff failed to file objections by that deadline or timely request another extension of the deadline to do so. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Extension, Doc. #13 , is DENIED AS UNTIMELY. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rene Harris Toliver on 3/2/2026) (Magistrate Judge Rene Harris Toliver)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Mon Mar 2 16:02:07 CST 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Extend Time filed by Tramaine Collin Kinney. (axm) |
|
Filing 12
JUDGMENT: This action is DISMISSED as barred by the three-strike provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 2/18/2026) (axm)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER ACCEPTING #6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 2/18/2026) (axm)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11, 12. Wed Feb 18 22:45:27 CST 2026 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Sun Jan 25 13:19:42 CST 2026 (crt) |
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #9 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to File Objections to Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Plaintiff's objection is now due by February 13, 2026 (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 1/23/2026) (chmb)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to #6 Findings and Recommendations filed by Tramaine Collin Kinney. (axm) |
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER terminating #7 Motion to Produce in light of the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed. In the event the District Judge declines to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to dismiss this action, Plaintiff may re-urge the motion. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 1/8/2026) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Thu Jan 8 09:39:45 CST 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Request for Production of Documents filed by Tramaine Collin Kinney. (kcr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Dec 22 14:32:12 CST 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Kinney's #4 motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be DENIED and this action should be DISMISSED as barred by the three-strike provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Such dismissal is with prejudice to Kinney refiling an in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice to him refiling this lawsuit with full payment of filing and administrative fees of $405.00. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/19/2025) (kcr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Dec 9 10:20:00 CST 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process shall be withheld pending completion of judicial screening, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until the Court enters a scheduling order, (4) no amendments or supplements to the complaint shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 12/8/2025) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Dec 5 14:09:25 CST 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Request for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tramaine Collin Kinney. (kcr) |
| Filing 3 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Tramaine Collin Kinney. (kcr) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kinney v. Securus Technologies | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tramaine Collin Kinney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Securus Technologies | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
