Gadepalli v. City of Irving, Texas et al
| Akhil Venkatasai Gadepalli |
| City of Irving, Texas and John Doe Police Officers (1-5) |
| 3:2025cv03490 |
| December 19, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: It is ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Taxable costs of court, as calculated by the clerk of court, are assessed against plaintiff. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 5/26/2026) (twd)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: On 4/09/2026 the court ordered that plaintiff demonstrate good cause, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and 6(b), for failing to effect service. When plaintiff did not comply with the order, the court by 5/01/2026 order again directed plaintiff to comply and advised that if plaintiff did not file the required response by 5/15/2026, the court would dismiss this action, without prejudice, by authority of Rule 4(m). Because plaintiff has not filed a response, this action is dismissed without prejudice by judgment filed today. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 5/26/2026) (twd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Tue May 26 15:49:48 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Sat May 2 19:40:24 CDT 2026 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: On 4/9/2026, the court ordered plaintiff to demonstrate good cause, in accordance with Rules 4(m) and 6(b), for failing to effect service. Plaintiff failed to file a response by the 4/23/2026 deadline. Accordingly, the court orders plaintiff to file a written response with the clerk of court no later than 5/15/2026. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 5/1/2026) (axm)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), the court orders that plaintiff demonstrate good cause, in accordance with Rules 4(m) and 6(b), for failing to effect service. Response due by 4/23/2026. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 4/9/2026) (axm)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Apr 9 15:03:24 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Irving, Texas, John Doe Police Officers (1-5). (kxm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against City of Irving, Texas, John Doe Police Officers (1-5) filed by Akhil Venkatasai Gadepalli. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number 300021433) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (kxm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Dec 19 17:06:47 CST 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
