Thompson v. Planet Fitness
| Gary Allen Thompson |
| Planet Fitness |
| 3:2026cv00342 |
| February 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Rebecca Rutherford |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Assault, Libel & Slander |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Feb 18 09:19:50 CST 2026 (crt) |
| Civil Case Terminated per 7 Electronic Order. (kaf) |
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss this case [Doc. 6] meets the requirements for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (providing that a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 2/17/2026) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Gary Allen Thompson. (axm) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Gary Allen Thompson. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (kxm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gary Allen Thompson. (kxm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Planet Fitness filed by Gary Allen Thompson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Feb 9 17:13:24 CST 2026 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. Planet Fitness | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gary Allen Thompson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Planet Fitness | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.