Thompson v. Planet Fitness
Plaintiff: Gary Allen Thompson
Defendant: Planet Fitness
Case Number: 3:2026cv00342
Filed: February 9, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Rutherford
Referring Judge: Karen Gren Scholer
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Assault, Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2026 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Feb 18 09:19:50 CST 2026 (crt)
February 17, 2026 Civil Case Terminated per 7 Electronic Order. (kaf)
February 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss this case [Doc. 6] meets the requirements for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (providing that a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 2/17/2026) (chmb)
February 12, 2026 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Gary Allen Thompson. (axm)
February 9, 2026 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Gary Allen Thompson. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (kxm)
February 9, 2026 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gary Allen Thompson. (kxm)
February 9, 2026 Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Planet Fitness filed by Gary Allen Thompson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm)
February 9, 2026 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm)
February 9, 2026 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm)
February 9, 2026 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Mon Feb 9 17:13:24 CST 2026 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Planet Fitness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Allen Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Planet Fitness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?