WAFA v. BUTLER et al
| AZMAT WAFA |
| Marco Rubio and Steven R Butler |
| 3:2026cv00633 |
| February 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Dismissal filed by Azmat Wafa (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Civil Case Terminated per #18 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (rekc) |
| Filing 17 REPLY filed by Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio re: #12 MOTION to Dismiss (Hasday-DOJ, Lisa) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Azmat Wafa re: #12 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Proposed Order) (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 15
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #14 Motion to Extend Time to File Reply. Plaintiffs response to defendants motion to dismiss is due June 12, 2026. (Ordered by Senior Judge David C Godbey on 5/8/2026) (chmb)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Azmat Wafa (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Hasday-DOJ, Lisa) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Hasday-DOJ, Lisa) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lisa Robin Hasday-DOJ on behalf of Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Hasday-DOJ, Lisa) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Steven R Butler ; served on 3/10/2026; Marco Rubio ; served on 3/10/2026. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Muhammed F Gulen on behalf of Azmat Wafa. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Gulen, Muhammed) |
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #3 Motion for Permission to Proceed Without Local Counsel. (Ordered by Senior Judge David C Godbey on 3/3/2026) (chmb)
|
| Filing 7 Summons issued as to Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ndt) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio. (kaf) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kaf) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by AZMAT WAFA. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Motion for Permission to Proceed to Local by AZMAT WAFA MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL. (Goldstein, Joshua) Modified text on 2/27/2026 (kaf). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AZMAT WAFA. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by AZMAT WAFA. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-16229425) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Cover Sheet) (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.