WAFA v. BUTLER et al
Plaintiff: AZMAT WAFA
Defendant: Marco Rubio and Steven R Butler
Case Number: 3:2026cv00633
Filed: February 26, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2026 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Steven R Butler ; served on 3/10/2026; Marco Rubio ; served on 3/10/2026. (Goldstein, Joshua)
March 11, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Muhammed F Gulen on behalf of Azmat Wafa. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Gulen, Muhammed)
March 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #3 Motion for Permission to Proceed Without Local Counsel. (Ordered by Senior Judge David C Godbey on 3/3/2026) (chmb)
March 2, 2026 Filing 7 Summons issued as to Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ndt)
February 27, 2026 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Steven R Butler, Marco Rubio. (kaf)
February 27, 2026 Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kaf)
February 26, 2026 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by AZMAT WAFA. (Goldstein, Joshua)
February 26, 2026 Filing 3 Motion for Permission to Proceed to Local by AZMAT WAFA MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO PROCEED WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL. (Goldstein, Joshua) Modified text on 2/27/2026 (kaf).
February 26, 2026 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AZMAT WAFA. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Goldstein, Joshua)
February 26, 2026 Filing 1 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by AZMAT WAFA. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-16229425) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Cover Sheet) (Goldstein, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WAFA v. BUTLER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AZMAT WAFA
Represented By: Muhammed F Gulen
Represented By: Joshua Laban Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marco Rubio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven R Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?