Phoenix v. United States of America et al
| Sage Phoenix |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Ethicon US LLC |
| 3:2026cv00680 |
| March 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| A Joe Fish |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ethicon US LLC. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Hudson, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,, with Jury Demand filed by Ethicon US LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney Timothy E Hudson added to party Ethicon US LLC(pty:dft) (Hudson, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. (Lippe, Emil) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ethicon US LLC ; served on 4/9/2026. (Lippe, Emil) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States of America ; served on 4/2/2026. (Lippe, Emil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Emil Lippe, Jr on behalf of Sage Phoenix. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Lippe, Emil) |
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Local Rule 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, no later than March 18, 2026, the plaintiff shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/5/2026) (chmb)
|
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to Ethicon US LLC, United States of America, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (cfk) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jeanette Tink Phoenix. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Whitcomb, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jeanette Tink Phoenix. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-16239286) Clerk to issue summonses for federal and non-federal defendants. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Whitcomb, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
