Compton v. Ryder System, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Harold Compton
Defendant: Jesus Duran, Panfilo Chavarria, Ryder System Inc and Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc
Case Number: 3:2026cv01515
Filed: May 11, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2026 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Harold Compton. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Dauphinot, Wes) (Main Document 11 flattened on 6/9/2026) (kcr).
June 8, 2026 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Panfilo Chavarria, Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc, Ryder System Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Johnson, J)
June 8, 2026 Filing 9 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint,, filed by Panfilo Chavarria, Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc, Ryder System Inc. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorney J Hunter Johnson added to party Panfilo Chavarria(pty:dft), Attorney J Hunter Johnson added to party Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc(pty:dft), Attorney J Hunter Johnson added to party Ryder System Inc(pty:dft) (Johnson, J)
May 22, 2026 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Harold Compton. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Dauphinot, Wes)
May 20, 2026 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ryder System Inc ; served on 5/18/2026. (Dauphinot, Wes)
May 20, 2026 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc ; served on 5/15/2026. (Dauphinot, Wes)
May 20, 2026 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Panfilo Chavarria ; served on 5/15/2026. (Dauphinot, Wes)
May 20, 2026 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Jesus Duran ; served on 5/15/2026. (Dauphinot, Wes)
May 12, 2026 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Panfilo Chavarria, Jesus Duran, Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc, Ryder System Inc. (ykp)
May 12, 2026 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp)
May 11, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Harold Compton. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-16436490) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Dauphinot, Wes)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Compton v. Ryder System, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harold Compton
Represented By: Wes Dauphinot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesus Duran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Panfilo Chavarria
Represented By: J Hunter Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryder System Inc
Represented By: J Hunter Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc
Represented By: J Hunter Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?