Budri v. Stevens
| Adriano Kruel Budri |
| Charles Eric Stevens |
| 3:2026cv01674 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David C Godbey |
| David L Horan |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER ACCEPTING #4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The motion for leave to file a complaint by a sanctioned litigant is therefore DENIED and this action is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. (Ordered by Senior Judge David C Godbey on 6/26/2026) (twd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Jun 26 13:43:24 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 8 (Proposed) Order re: #4 Findings and Recommendations by Adriano Kruel Budri. (axm) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Monetary Sanctions filed by Adriano Kruel Budri. (axm) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Findings and Recommendations by Adriano Kruel Budri. (axm) |
|
Filing 4
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should deny the motion for leave to file the complaint and administratively close this action initiated by a sanctioned litigant. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/11/2026) (twd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Jun 11 08:22:30 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Thu Jun 4 11:29:32 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Charles Eric Stevens filed by Adriano Kruel Budri. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Budri v. Stevens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adriano Kruel Budri | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charles Eric Stevens | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
