Horton v. Dallas Police Department
| Gregory Dwight Horton |
| Dallas Police Department |
| 3:2026cv01684 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Ada Brown |
| Brian McKay |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice that the clerk has been instructed to apply the attached sanction order to the submissions indexed under number: 3:26-cv-01684-E-BW. The sanction order was originally filed in: 3:25-cv-3417-K and states: Gregory Dwight Horton is BARRED from filing future actions in this district, without first obtaining leave of court to do so, and any case filed, removed, or transferred, in which he is the plaintiff, should not be reviewed by the court, unless he obtains leave of court to file it from a United States District Judge or a United States Magistrate Judge in this district, through a proper motion for leave to file the action. That order prohibits the filing of a case, so the number assigned to this closed matter remains for indexing purposes only. (twd) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed May 27 10:28:35 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Tue May 26 10:46:55 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gregory Dwight Horton. (kxm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT and Request for Injunction against Dallas Police Department filed by Gregory Dwight Horton. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge McKay (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge McKay). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Horton v. Dallas Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gregory Dwight Horton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dallas Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
