Joseph v. Cauley et al
| Clarence Joseph |
| Pandora Cauley and Christopher Wiedau |
| 3:2026cv01822 |
| June 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| David L Horan |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Also mailed to Inmate Trust Fund Account Fri Jul 10 10:40:14 CDT 2026 (crt) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #4 , #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Clerk note: TDCJ Inmate Trust Office has been electronically notified of this order.) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/9/2026) (ndt)
|
| Filing 9 Supporting Facts and Evidentiary Items and Notice of Compliance by Plaintiff Clarence Joseph re: #3 Complaint. (axm) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Clarence Joseph. (axm) |
|
Filing 7
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should deny Plaintiff Clarence Joseph's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction [Dkt. No. #5 ]. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/12/2026) (kcr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Jun 12 08:51:02 CDT 2026 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER REGARDING FILING FEE: Clarence Joseph must address the following deficiency: (1) the $405.00 filing fee is received or (2) Joseph files an amended motion to proceed IFP and attaches to that motion a complete and verified CTA. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 07/13/2026 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/11/2026) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner IFP Form) (kcr)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Jun 11 09:13:02 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri Jun 5 09:16:17 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Clarence Joseph. (kxm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Clarence Joseph. (kxm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Pandora Cauley, Christopher Wiedau filed by Clarence Joseph. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
