Braun v. Hyatt Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Charles Braun
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation and Hyatt Corporation doing business as Hyatt Regency Dallas
Case Number: 3:2026cv01839
Filed: June 3, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: A Joe Fish
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2026 Filing 12 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Charles Braun. (Barbe, Rodgers)
June 25, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STATUS REPORT ORDER: In accordance with Rule 16(b), F.R. CIV. P., counsel are directed to confer for the purpose of submitting a JOINT status report in this case. The report shall be ELECTRONICALLY FILED no later than 7/16/2026. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/25/2026) (twd)
June 24, 2026 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Charles Braun. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Barbe, Rodgers)
June 15, 2026 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Thompson, Landon) (Main Document 9 flattened on 6/16/2026) (kxm). Modified on 6/16/2026 (kxm).
June 12, 2026 Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation re: #3 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer, (Thompson, Landon)
June 8, 2026 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hyatt Corporation. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Logan, Michael)
June 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC ORDER: On June 3, 2026, the defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation filed a notice of removal in this case. N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 81.2 requires that "[w]ithin 21 days after the notice of removal is filed, the plaintiff shall file a separately signed certificate of interested persons that complies with LR 3.1(c) or 3.2(e)." Accordingly, no later than June 24, 2026, the plaintiff must comply with Rule 3.1(c) so that the court can ensure that recusal is not required in this case. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/8/2026) (chmb)
June 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC ORDER: N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 81.1(a)(4)(D) provides that "[t]he party or parties that remove a civil action from state court must provide the following to the clerk for filing... a separately signed certificate of interested persons that complies with LR 3.1(c) or 3.2(e)." Accordingly, no later than June 15, 2026, the defendants must comply with this rule. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/8/2026) (chmb)
June 8, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE of Consent to Removal filed by Hyatt Corporation (Bright, Kayla)
June 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order to Show Cause: No later than June 15, 2026, Schindler shall show cause in writing, if any it has, why it failed to join Hyatt in its removal of this case and why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/5/2026) (cea)
June 3, 2026 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm)
June 3, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-16503319) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) to Notice of Removal, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Thompson, Landon) (Attachment 2 and 3 flattened on 6/4/2026) (kxm).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Braun v. Hyatt Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Braun
Represented By: Rodgers Connor Barbe
Represented By: Collen A Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation
Represented By: Landon H Thompson
Represented By: Lindsey C Cummings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyatt Corporation doing business as Hyatt Regency Dallas
Represented By: Kayla Marie Bright
Represented By: Michael A Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?