White v. Scott et al
| Sheral White |
| Eric Scott, Sr and Eric Scott, Jr |
| 3:2026cv02101 |
| June 25, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Karen Gren Scholer |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated per #9 Notice of Dismissal. (ykp) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Sheral White re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Choi, Dong) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Defendant of Scott Sr. filed by Sheral White (Choi, Dong) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Dismissal Voluntary Dismissal of Scott Jr. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A) filed by Sheral White (Choi, Dong) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Eric Scott, Jr. (axm) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Sheral White. (Choi, Dong) (Main Document 7 replaced on 7/13/2026 to flatten pdf) (axm). |
| Filing 6 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Eric Scott, Sr re #5 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Cronin, William) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Eric Scott, Sr (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cronin, William) |
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC STANDING ORDER: Counsel are required to review and comply with the Court's Judge Specific Requirements, which can be found here: # Judge Requirements . The Court updates its Requirements periodically. Also, counsel are required to review and comply with the Northern District of Texas's Local Civil Rules, which can be found here: # Civil Rules . In particular, the Court directs counsel to review Rules 3.1, 7.4, and 81.2, regarding certificates of interested persons, and Rule 83.10, regarding local counsel. Counsel are expected to review the Requirements and Local Rules before contacting the Court with questions. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 6/25/2026) (kxm)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Eric Scott, Sr.. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Bruce, Stacy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Eric Scott, Sr.. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-16561775) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-Index of Pleadings, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B-Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C-State Court Pleadings, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit D-D's COIP, #5 Cover Sheet, #6 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Bruce, Stacy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
