Amgen Inc v. Booker-Luton
| Amgen Inc |
| Marla Marie Booker-Luton |
| 3:2026cv02160 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following exhibits are SEALED and restricted from public access: Dkt. 10, Exhibits G and O. Any party may move to refile the affected materials, if properly part of the record, in redactedform under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/17/2026) (kcr)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 3:26-cv-2160-D consolidated with lead case 3:26-CV-2156-D. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 3:26-CV-2156-D. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 8/17/2026) (kcr)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Strike #10 Reply,, Docket No. 10 (Ex. G and Ex. O) filed by Marla Marie Booker-Luton with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Motion to Seal/ Strike) (Booker-Luton, Marla) |
| Filing 10 REPLY filed by Amgen Inc re: #9 Cross MOTION to Vacate #1 Complaint,,,,, Defendants Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and (Attachments: #1 Appendix in Support of Reply, #2 A (App. 0001-0018), #3 B (App. 0019-0021), #4 C (App. 0022-0024), #5 D (App. 0025-0065), #6 E (App. 0066-0080), #7 F (App. 0081-0090), #8 G (App. 0091-0139), #9 H (App. 0140-0148), #10 I (App. 0149-0152), #11 J (App. 0153-0181), #12 K (App. 0182-0184), #13 L (App. 0185-0202), #14 M (App. 0203-0232), #15 N (App. 0233-0246), #16 O (App. 0247-0316)) (Hartmann, Michelle) Modified security per pro se defendant on 8/13/2026 (cea). |
| Filing 9 Cross MOTION to Vacate #1 Complaint,,,,, Defendants Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and filed by Marla Marie Booker-Luton with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Declaration(s) Declaration of Marla Booker-Luton, #2 Exhibit(s) Index to Appendix, #3 Exhibit(s) Appendix Vol. 1 of 4 (Tabs 1-6, App 1-62), #4 Exhibit(s) Appendix Vol. 2 of 4 (Tabs 7-11; App. 63-89), #5 Exhibit(s) Appendix Vol. 3 of 4 (Tabs 12-17; App.90-134), #6 Exhibit(s) Appendix Vol. 4 of 4 (Tabs 18-22; App.135-170, #7 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Booker-Luton, Marla) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Marla Marie Booker-Luton. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Booker-Luton, Marla) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Marla Booker-Luton ; served on 7/8/2026. (Hartmann, Michelle) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Amgen Inc (Hartmann, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Marla Booker-Luton. (kxm) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Amgen Inc.. (Hartmann, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Amgen Inc.. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Hartmann, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marla Booker-Luton filed by Amgen Inc.. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number BTXNDC-16572808) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I, #10 Exhibit(s) J, #11 Proposed Order, #12 Cover Sheet) (Hartmann, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Amgen Inc v. Booker-Luton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amgen Inc | |
| Represented By: | Ariel Bryant |
| Represented By: | Michelle LeGrand Hartmann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Marla Marie Booker-Luton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
