Marshall v. Federal Military Black Oops et al
| Kenneth Adam Marshall |
| Federal Military Black Oops, Frank Bradley and PNC Bank |
| 3:2026cv02176 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Brian McKay |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:19. Wed Aug 19 13:03:44 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court GRANTS the #11 , #16 motions to supplement. The Court should DISMISS the #12 Motion/Petition for the Plainti[f]f's Definitive Statement Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12, liberally construed as an amended complaint and as supplemented, as frivolous and malicious under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court also should DENY the #13 Motion/Petition for an Injunction FRCvP Rule 65(b), 29 U.S.C. 662. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 8/18/2026) (twd) |
Filing 18
ORDER: Plaintiff Kenneth Adam Marshall's #9 Motion to Amend is GRANTED, and the Court has considered its contents in its Amended Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Marshall's #14 second Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, is TERMINATED in light of the Amended Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the Court dismiss Marshall's amended complaint, as supplemented, in this action. If the United States District Judge declines to accept the recommendation to dismiss the amended complaint, Marshall may re-urge the application. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 8/18/2026) (twd)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule37 'Spoilation of Federal Evidence' filed by Frank Bradley. (axm) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Supplement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 15(d) filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
| Filing 15 Judicial Notice filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Injunction filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Supplement filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
| Filing 12 MOTION/Petition for the Plaintiff's Definitive Statement Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12 filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) Docket text modified on 8/19/2026 (twd). |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Amend Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 15. The Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a complete amended complaint no later than August 4, 2026. To the extent Marshall requests a hearing to discuss his proposed amendments, the Court DENIES the request. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 7/21/2026) (cea)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Tue Jul 21 11:45:50 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Federal Civil Rules of Procedure, Rule 45 Subpoena(s) or the Federal Rules of Discovery, Rule 45 filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend Pursuant to the Federal Civil Rules of Procedure Rule 15 "Amendments" filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Mon Jul 20 07:24:17 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 15 filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (axm) |
Filing 6
ORDER terminating #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If the United States District Judge declines to accept the recommendation to dismiss the complaint, Marshall may re-urge the application. (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 7/17/2026) (cea)
|
| Filing 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case re: #3 Complaint filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. The Court should DISMISS the civil complaint, filed on June 30, 2026, as frivolous and malicious under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). (Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Brian McKay on 7/17/2026) (cea) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Wed Jul 1 10:48:58 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. (kxm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Frank Bradley, Federal Military Black Oops, PNC Bank filed by Kenneth Adam Marshall. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kxm) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kxm) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge McKay (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge McKay). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kxm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.