Washington v. Chapman

Washington v. Chapman

Petitioner:	Conchita Washington
Respondent:	W Elaine Chapman
Case Number:	4:2009cv00305
Filed:	June 1, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Fort Worth Office
County:	Tarrant
Presiding Judge:	Charles Bleil
Presiding Judge:	Terry R Means
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 10, 2009	Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations: the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED, as modified herein. Conchita Washington's grounds one through three in the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 are DENIED; and ground four is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 12/10/2009) (cxb) Modified on 12/10/2009/Dist 12/10 (cxb).
November 10, 2009	Filing 17 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND NOTICE AND ORDER... that Washington's petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Objections to F&R due by 12/1/2009. See findings for further specifics. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Charles Bleil on 11/10/2009) (krg)(copy to Washington)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 10, 2009

Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations: the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED, as modified herein. Conchita Washington's grounds one through three in the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 are DENIED; and ground four is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 12/10/2009) (cxb) Modified on 12/10/2009/Dist 12/10 (cxb).

November 10, 2009

Filing 17 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND NOTICE AND ORDER... that Washington's petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Objections to F&R due by 12/1/2009. See findings for further specifics. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Charles Bleil on 11/10/2009) (krg)(copy to Washington)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Chapman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Conchita Washington
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: W Elaine Chapman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?