Souza v. United States of America
Heather Ann Souza |
Federal Medical Center Carswell, Federal Bureau of Prisons, E Chapman, A Mejia, M Kelly, Ingram and Kelly |
4:2009cv00469 |
August 10, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Fort Worth Office |
Tarrant |
Charles Bleil |
Terry R Means |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF BUREAU OF PRISONS, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY, ORDER RESOLVING MOTIONS TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, and ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE: re: granting 31 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment fi led by United States of America, Federal Medical Center Carswell, granting 34 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Kiesha Kelly, John Ingram, United States of America, Eddy M. Mejia; denying as moot 41 Motion to Stay Discove ry filed by Kiesha Kelly, John Ingram, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, Eddy M Mejia. Further, plaintiff Souza shall have until 4:30 p.m. on March 11, 2011, to file a Notice of Change of Address listing her current address, or to show cause why her remaining claims in this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Order for further specifics. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 2/18/2011) (egb) emailed to Betty Parker |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.