Rayford v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Cathy Rayford
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2010cv00174
Filed: March 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Fort Worth Office
Presiding Judge: Charles Bleil
Presiding Judge: Terry R Means
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration. Within fourteen days of this date, counsel for Rayford shall submit a proposed form of judgment conforming to this memorandum opinion and order. [see Order for specifics] (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/29/2011) (klm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rayford v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Rayford
Represented By: Julie L Glover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?