Beard v. Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff: Beverly J Beard
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 4:2012cv00652
Filed: September 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Fort Worth Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1396 - Tort Negligence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Memorandum Opinion and Order...The United States of America be substituted as defendant for BOP, Hunter, Pennagraft, Edwards and Sick-Call Clinic. Further ordered that all claims by pltf against BOP, Hunter, Pennagraft, Edwards, Sick-Call Clinic and USA are dismissed w/ prejudice. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 12/20/2012) (wrb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beard v. Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beverly J Beard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?