Lundgren v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Kenneth Olaf Lundgren
Respondent: William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 4:2014cv00014
Filed: January 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Fort Worth Office
County: Brazoria
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: After having considered the pleadings, state court records, and relief sought by petitioner, the Court has concluded that the petition should be denied. The Court further ORDERS that a certificate of appealability be, and is hereby, denied. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 8/26/2015) (trs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lundgren v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Olaf Lundgren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?