Davis v. City of Fort Worth et al
Plaintiff: Nelda Davis
Defendant: City of Fort Worth, Dacian Halmagean and Amy Olson
Case Number: 4:2014cv00491
Filed: May 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Fort Worth Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 114 Memorandum Opinion and Order...the motion for summary judgment is granted; plaintiff take nothing on her claims against City, and that such claims are dismissed w/prej. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 8/6/2015) (wrb)
August 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 112 Memorandum Opinion and Order...the motions of Officers Halmagean and Olson for summary judgment granted; plaintiff take nothing on claims against said defendants and claims dismissed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 8/4/2015) (wrb)
October 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part, denying in part 65 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Amy Olson, 63 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Dacian Halmagean re: 65 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Sta te a Claim, 63 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim The claims and causes of action asserted against Olson and Halmagean in their official capacities are dismissed w/o prej; all state law claims asserted by plaintiff against Olson and Halmagean are dismissed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 10/30/2014) (wrb)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 79 Memorandum Opinion and Order...Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and that all claims asserted by plaintiff against defendants are dismissed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 10/29/2014) (wrb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. City of Fort Worth et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nelda Davis
Represented By: Kevin N Colquitt
Represented By: Christopher S Hamilton
Represented By: Meagan Martin
Represented By: Angela T Pacheco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Fort Worth
Represented By: Laetitia Coleman Brown
Represented By: Maleshia Brown Farmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dacian Halmagean
Represented By: Kenneth E East
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Olson
Represented By: Kenneth E East
Represented By: D Lee Thomas, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?