Hurdsman v. Cadell et al
| Rodney A Hurdsman |
| NFN Cadell, NFN Hodges, NFN Rogers and County of Wise, Texas |
| 4:2015cv00703 |
| September 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Tarrant |
| Terry R Means |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION, FINDING THAT PLAINTIFF IS BARRED FROM PROCEEDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FULL FEES: Therefore, the findings, conclusions and recommendati on of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED. Plaintiff Rodney A, Hursdman aka Rodney Adam Hurdsman is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. If plaintiff Hurdsman wishes to proceed with this action, he must pay to the clerk of Court the full filing and administrative fees of $400.00 within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely pay the full filing and administrative fees to the clerk of Court could result in the dismissal of t his action without further notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). re: 5 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Complaint filed by Rodney A Hurdsman, 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rodney A Hurdsman. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L Cureton no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 12/9/2015) (trs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
