Ortiz et al v. American Airlines Inc et al
| Salvadora Ortiz and Thomas Scott |
| American Airlines Inc, American Airlines Pension Asset Administration Committee and American Airlines Federal Credit Union |
| 4:2016cv00151 |
| February 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Dallas |
| John McBryde |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
231
ORDER granting 178 Motion for Summary Judgment. ; granting 180 Motion for Summary Judgment. plaintiffs take nothing on their claims against defendants; and that plaintiffs' claims be, and are hereby, dismissed with prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 8/5/2020) (wrb)
|
|
Filing
54
Memorandum Opinion and Order...consistent with the foregoing, the court is withholding a final ruling on the motion filed by plaintiffs on July 18 2016, the court orders that if plaintiffs wish to take steps to resolve the concerns of the court expr essed in section IV above, they advise the court of that fact by a document filed by Dec 8 2016, providing in that document a detailed description of what plaintiffs proposed to do to resolve those concerns and when the court can expect them to do whatever that is. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 11/18/2016) (wrb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
