MacLean v. Arentz Law Group, Attorneys at Law, PLLC et al
| John R MacLean |
| Arentz Law Group, Attorneys at Law, PLLC, Arentz Law Group, P.C. and Johnston Law Group |
| 4:2016cv00797 |
| August 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Tarrant |
| John McBryde |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
Memorandum Opinion and Order... The court ORDERS that movants' motion for summary judgment be, and is hereby, granted in part and (1) plaintiff's claims asserted in count one of plaintiff's complaint be, and are hereby, dismissed; an d (2) plaintiff's claim asserted in count two of plaintiff's complaint as to defendant Arentz Law Group, Attorneys at Law PLLC, be, and is hereby dismissed. The court otherwise ORDERS that the motion for summary judgment be, and is hereby, denied. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 7/27/2017) (wxc)
|
|
Filing
33
Memorandum Opinion and Order... The court ORDERS that plaintiff's motion to dismiss be, and is hereby, granted, and the counterclaims asserted by defendants be, and are hereby, dismissed. The court determines that there is no just reason for delay in, and hereby directs, entry of final judgment as to the dismissal of defendant's counterclaims. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 11/30/2016) (wxc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
