Driessen v. Innovate Loan Servicing Corporation et al
| Rochelle Driessen |
| Innovate Loan Servicing Corporation and Caprock Auto Remarketing |
| 4:2016cv01066 |
| November 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Tarrant |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 60 ) and reply objections (ECF No. 65 ) are OVERRULED, and the FCR (ECF No. 56 ) is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 49 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. A final judgment will issue by separate order. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/28/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 48 ) are OVERRULED, and the FCR (ECF No. 47 ) is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 41 ) is DENIED in its entirety. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/14/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing
35
Order: The United States Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff Ramonica Frances Green's (Plaintiff) Motion for Summary Judgment be denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has since withdrawn the Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and deemed withdrawn and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (ECF No. 32) are DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/6/2017) (trt)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER: Before the Court is the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 27 ), filed July 5, 2017. Also before the court is Plaintiff's Objections to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 28 ), filed July 17, 2017. Having considered the motions, the Court DOES NOT ADOPT the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Objections demonstrate her reasonable diligence to serve Defendant at its registered office. Under Texas Business Organization Code Section 5.251 the Secretary of State is an appropriate proxy for service. The Court finds that Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause for her failure to properly serve Defendant with in the appropriate period. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time for Service of Process (ECF No. 29 ), filed August 10, 2017 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff must properly serve defendant on or before November 22, 2017. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/22/2017) (skg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
