Green v. The SYGMA Network, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lucius Green
Defendant: The SYGMA Network, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: ADR Provider
Case Number: 4:2017cv00377
Filed: May 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Fort Worth Office
County: Tarrant
Presiding Judge: Terry R Means
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 FINAL JUDGMENT... In accordance with the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed on November 20, 2017 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, all claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their refiling. All costs of Court under 28 U.S.C. 1920 shall be borne, as agreed by the parties, by the party incurring the same. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 11/22/2017) (wxc)
November 20, 2017 Filing 16 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Lucius Green. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Forsman, Wade)
November 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO FILE DISMISSAL DOCUMENTS... The Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary (doc. 14) filed November 14, 2017, in the above-styled and -numbered cause, indicates that all matters in controversy between the parties have been settled. Accordingly, the parties must file an agreed motion to dismiss or a stipulation of dismissal due to settlement no later than December 15, 2017. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 11/15/2017) (wxc)
November 14, 2017 Filing 14 Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary filed by M Beth Krugler. Attorneys in Attendance: Wade Forsman and Peter Stuhldreher. Prv Fee: $ 1300 per party. Outcome of ADR: Settled as a result of ADR. (Krugler, M)
September 20, 2017 Filing 13 Designation of Experts by Lucius Green. (Forsman, Wade)
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OF REFERRAL FOR MEDIATIONIN NOVEMBER 2017 AND ORDER APPOINTING MEDIATOR... The court appoints M Beth Krugler as mediator. The parties are to complete mediation during the month of November. ADR Summary provided as Exhibit B to the order. The clerk will send any requested documents to the mediator. ADR Summary form due 12/7/2017. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 8/15/2017) (wxc)
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 9/5/2017. Amended Pleadings due by 10/20/2017. Discovery due by 12/20/2017. Motions due by 1/22/2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 8/15/2017) (wxc)
July 5, 2017 Filing 10 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint,, filed by The SYGMA Network, Inc.. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Stuhldreher, Peter)
June 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #7 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT LOCAL COUNSEL (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 6/27/2017) (bdb)
June 23, 2017 Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report and Proposed Discovery Plan filed by Lucius Green. (Forsman, Wade)
June 22, 2017 Filing 7 MOTION Leave to Proceed w/o local counsel filed by Lucius Green (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Forsman, Wade)
June 20, 2017 Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against The SYGMA Network, Inc. filed by Lucius Green. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc)
June 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT #4 ... Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (doc. 4).1 After review of the motion, the Court concludes that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. The First Amended Complaint is DEEMED filed this same day, and the clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file a copy of the amended pleading, which was attached as an exhibit to the motion for leave. See N.D. Tex. L. Civ. R. 15.1(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 6/20/2017) (wxc)
June 15, 2017 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Lucius Green (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Forsman, Wade)
June 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SUBMIT JOINT STATUS REPORT AND PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN... The parties are ordered to electronically file with the clerk of the court the signed joint status report and proposed discovery plan (one instrument) within 28 days of the date of the filing of this order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 6/7/2017) (wxc)
May 5, 2017 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (hth)
May 5, 2017 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 352nd District Court, Tarrant County, Texas, case number 352-291153-17 filed by The SYGMA Network, Inc.. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-8391778) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C1-C6, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Cover Sheet, #7 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Stuhldreher, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. The SYGMA Network, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The SYGMA Network, Inc.
Represented By: Peter J Stuhldreher
Represented By: Matthew W Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lucius Green
Represented By: Wade A Forsman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: ADR Provider
Represented By: M Beth Krugler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?