Perez v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
Antonio Perez |
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, William Cox and William Baxter |
4:2017cv00490 |
June 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Fort Worth Office |
Tarrant |
John McBryde |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re: 22 Motion to Dismiss. The court ORDERS that all claims and causes of action asserted by plaintiff against Allstate other than his breach of contract claim, which is alleged in paragraphs 46 and 47, on page 14, o f plaintiff's first amended complaint, be, and are hereby, dismissed with prejudice. The court further ORDERS that by September 27, 2017, plaintiff file a second amended complaint in which the only defendant named will be Allstate, and the onl y claim or cause of action asserted therein will be plaintiff's claim or cause of action against Allstate for breach of the policy contract. The court further ORDERS that by October 11, 2017, Allstate file an answer or other response to such second amended complaint. The court further ORDERS that the title to the above-captioned action be changed so that from this point forward it shall be "Antonio Perez, Plaintiff, v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, Defendant." (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 9/20/2017) (tln) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.