Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vanblaricum et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Chet Inglis, James Vanblaricum, Matthew Leaverton, Robert Gilliam, Rodney L Pope, William Hill and Erik Rhodes |
| 4:2018cv00518 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Tarrant |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. § 77 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before September 12, 2018. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/15/2018) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:24. Wed Aug 15 17:05:22 CDT 2018 (crt) |
|
Filing 23
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO ERIK RHODES (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/6/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing 22
JUDGMENT AS TO WILLIAM HILL (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/6/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing 21
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO JAMES VANBLARICUM (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/6/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing 20
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO ROBERT GILLIAM (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/6/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing 19
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RODNEY L. POPE (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/6/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing 18
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO CHET INGLIS (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/6/2018) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. Fri Jul 6 16:53:25 CDT 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Matthew Leaverton. (wxc) |
| Filing 16 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. File to Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Consent of William Hill by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Consent of Rodney Pope by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Consent of Defendant Robert Gilliam by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Consent of Defendant James Vanblaricum by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Consent of Defendant Erik Rhodes by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Consent of Defendant Chet Inglis by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Judgment Unopposed Motion to Enter Judgment Against Defendant James Vanblaricum filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Consent of James Vanblaricum, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Proposed Final Judgment as to James Vanblaricum, #3 Proposed Order) (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Judgment Unopposed Motion to Enter Judgment for Erik Rhodes filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Consent of Erik Rhodes, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Proposed Final Judgment as to Erik Rhodes, #3 Proposed Order) (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Judgment Unopposed Motion to Enter Final Judgment as to Rodney Pope filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Consent of Rodney Pope, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Final Judgment as to Rodney Pope, #3 Proposed Order) (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Judgment Unopposed Motion to Enter Judgment as to Chet Inglis filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Consent of Chet Inglis, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Proposed Final Judgment as to Chet Inglis, #3 Proposed Order) (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Judgment Unopposed Motion to Enter Judgment Against Defendant William Hill filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Consent of William Hill, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Proposed Judgment as to William Hill, #3 Proposed Order) (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Judgment Unopposed Motion to Enter Judgment Against Robert Gilliam filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A: Consent of Robert Gilliam, #2 Exhibit(s) B: Proposed Final Judgment as to Robert Gilliam, #3 Proposed Order) (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case filed by Securities and Exchange Commission (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Frank, Janie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Frank, Janie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
