Mora v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Elva Mora |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC |
| 4:2018cv00734 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Real Property: All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Elva Mora re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss (edm) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Having considered the motion #8 , the court finds that it should be granted. The court ORDERS that the deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC's motion to dismiss be, and is hereby, extended to 4:00 p.m. on October 29, 2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/26/2018) (edm)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline filed by Elva Mora. (edm) |
| Filing 7 Rule 12(B)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC. (edm) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed by Elva Mora. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (edm) |
| Filing 5 Judge McBryde's paper original and copy of #1 Notice of Removal received pursuant to standing order. (bdb) |
| Filing 4 Rule 12(B)(6) MOTION to Dismiss filed by Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC. (bdb) |
|
Filing 3
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 9/4/2018) (edm)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (edm) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC. (see doc #1 ) (edm) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 236th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, case number 236-301304-18 filed by Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC. (Filer fee $400; Receipt No. 0539-9425067) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet [Civil Cover Sheet], #2 Exhibit(s) [Exhibit A], #3 Exhibit(s) [Exhibit B], #4 Exhibit(s) [Exhibit C1], #5 Exhibit(s) [Exhibit C2], #6 Exhibit(s) [Exhibit C3], #7 Exhibit(s) [Exhibit C4], #8 Exhibit(s) [Exhibit D]) (Steinmark, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
