Wooderts v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Levi Wooderts, Jr
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 4:2018cv00773
Filed: September 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2018 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General; served on 10/31/2018. (mpw)
October 24, 2018 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States of America (US Attorney); served on 10/24/2018. (mpw)
October 17, 2018 Filing 11 Public correspondence received from Levi Wooderts, Jr. (mpw)
October 17, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. remailed to facility as well Wed Oct 17 09:54:02 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 16, 2018 Filing 10 Summons issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (mpw) (summons, USM 285, and Complaint placed in USMS box)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING SERVICE ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: The court ORDERS that the clerk complete appropriate and sufficient forms to facilitate service of the summons and complaint on defendant. The court further ORDERS that, upon completion of such forms, the clerk issue summons, with copy of complaint attached, for service on defendant, and deliver them, and sufficient copies thereof, to the United States Marshal for the Northern District of Texas for service on defendant in the manner contemplated by the rule set forth above. The court further ORDERS that, upon receipt of such process papers from the clerk, the United States Marshal for the Northern District of Texas cause service of summons to be made in the manner contemplated by the rule set forth above. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/16/2018) (mpw)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE: COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF FULL FILING FEE: Plaintiff shall pay $278.80, the balance of the filing fee, in monthly installments as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b) (2). The agency having custody of plaintiff shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to plaintiff's inmate trust account and forward payments to the Court on a regular basis provided the account exceeds $10.00. (copy mailed to Fort Worth FCI) (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/16/2018) (mpw)
October 16, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Tue Oct 16 14:54:06 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 16, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Tue Oct 16 12:39:01 CDT 2018 (crt)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order For Partial Filing Fee in amount of $71.20 with a balance of $278.80 remaining. Clerk to mail this order to the attention of the Inmate Trust Fund Department at the facility where the inmate resides. (copy mailed to Fort Worth FCI) (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 9/24/2018) (mpw)
September 24, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon Sep 24 14:43:14 CDT 2018 (crt)
September 21, 2018 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Previous Filings by Levi Wooderts, Jr. (mpw)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ***ORIGINALLY ENTERED IN 4:18-mc-00019-A*** ORDER: The court ORDERS that the motion for leave be, and is hereby, granted, and the clerk is directed to file the complaint Wooderts has lodged with the court, noting that United States of America is the sole defendant. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 9/19/2018) (bdb)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 9/19/2018) (bdb)
September 19, 2018 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to staff attorney DK.
September 19, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Levi Wooderts, Jr. (bdb)
September 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America filed by Levi Wooderts, Jr. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb)
September 19, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Wed Sep 19 14:31:16 CDT 2018 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wooderts v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Levi Wooderts, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?