Jenkins v. United States of America
| Bentley M Jenkins |
| United States of America |
| 4:2018cv00777 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7, 8. Tue Sep 25 09:21:23 CDT 2018 (crt) |
Filing 8
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with its opinion and order signed this day, the Court DISMISSES the petition of Bentley M. Jenkins pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651 in the above-captioned action for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/24/2018) (skg)
|
|
Filing 7
Opinion and Order: For the reasons discussed herein, Petitioner's petition for a writ of error coram nobis is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Further, for the reasons discussed, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/24/2018) (skg)
|
| Filing 6 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bcr) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bcr) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis by Bentley M Jenkins. (bcr) Modified on 9/20/2018 (bcr). |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, by Bentley M Jenkins. (bcr) |
| Filing 2 Petitioner's Memorandum in Support filed by Bentley M Jenkins re #1 Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s)) (bcr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and Request for Expedited Hearing filed by Bentley M Jenkins. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bcr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/20/2018: #1 Cover Letter) (bcr). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5, 6. Thu Sep 20 15:13:30 CDT 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jenkins v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bentley M Jenkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
