Williams v. United States Postal Service Inc
Plaintiff: Tanera Williams and Antonio Chism
Defendant: United States Postal Service Inc, Shenita Burley and United States Postal Service
Case Number: 4:2018cv00846
Filed: October 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2018 Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Postal Service ; served on 10/26/2018. (npk) (Main Document 21 replaced on 12/7/2018) (npk).
December 7, 2018 Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Postal Service ; USAG served on 11/19/2018. (npk)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER denying #14 Motion to Reinstate. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/20/2018) (npk)
November 19, 2018 Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Shenita Burley ; US Attorney General served on 10/31/2018. (npk)
November 19, 2018 Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Shenita Burley ; US Attorney served on 10/27/2018. (npk)
November 19, 2018 Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Shenita Burley ; served on 10/25/2018. (npk)
November 19, 2018 Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Postal Service ; US Attorney served on 10/25/2018. (npk)
November 19, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION to Reinstate filed by Antonio Chism, Tanera Williams (npk)
November 16, 2018 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Antonio Chism, Tanera Williams re: #9 Order to Show Cause. (npk)
November 16, 2018 Filing 12 Judge McBryde's original and copy received pursuant to Standing Order, #5 Order, and #9 Order re: #1 Complaint, filed by Antonio Chism, Tanera Williams. [Attachment #1, civil cover sheet to complaint, not provided] (npk)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT: Consistent with the order signed in this action on the date of the signing of this final judgment, The court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that all claims and causes of action asserted by plaintiffs, Tanera Williams, individually, and as next friend of E.W., J.W., T.R. and T.R., minor children, and Antonio Chism, against defendants, Shenita Burley and United States Postal Service, be, and are hereby, dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/14/2018) (npk)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. The court ORDERS that the claims and causes of action asserted by plaintiffs against defendants, Shenita Burley and United States Postal Service, be, and are hereby, dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/14/2018) (npk)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The court ORDERS that by 4:00 p.m. on November 13, 2018, plaintiffs show cause, by appropriate written filing, why the court should not dismiss the above-captioned action for plaintiffs' failure to comply with this court's October 24, 2018 order. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/6/2018) (npk)
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER UNFILING DOCUMENT #7 Plaintiff's Original Complaint filed by Antonio Chism, Tanera Williams due to the following deficiency: All documents should be filed in traditional paper form, bearing the original signature of the filer. Also see the standing order docketed in this action on October 15, 2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/30/2018) (npk)
October 30, 2018 Filing 7 ***UNFILED PER #8 ORDER*** Judge McBryde's paper original and courtesy copy of re: #1 Complaint, filed by Antonio Chism, Tanera Williams. (npk)
October 29, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tanera Williams, Antonio Chism. (npk) Modified text on 10/30/2018 (tln).
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The court ORDERS that by October 29, 2018, plaintiffs comply with the court's standing order and also file their certificate of interested persons. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of plaintiffs' claims without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/24/2018) (npk)
October 15, 2018 Filing 4 Summons issued as to Shenita Burley, United States Postal Service, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (npk)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/15/2018) (npk)
October 12, 2018 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (npk)
October 12, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against United States Postal Service Inc filed by Tanera Williams. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-9514017) Clerk to issue summons(es) for federal defendant(s). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Forteith, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. United States Postal Service Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shenita Burley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanera Williams
Represented By: William Ayrl Forteith
Represented By: Carin Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Chism
Represented By: William Ayrl Forteith
Represented By: Carin Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?