Baggett v. USA
| Joshua Allen Baggett |
| USA |
| 4:2018cv00856 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Government's Surreply due by 12/18/2018 re: #10 Reply. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/4/2018) (npk)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Tue Dec 4 16:13:19 CST 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 10 REPLY filed by Joshua Allen Baggett re: #8 Response (npk) |
| Filing 9 Appendix in Support filed by USA re #8 Response. (bdb) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE In Opposition filed by USA re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (bdb) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by USA. (bdb) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ for USA added, Lindsey E Beran-DOJ terminated. (bdb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Lindsey E Beran-DOJ for USA added. Show Cause Response due by 11/21/2018. Replies due by 12/3/2018.(Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/22/2018) (bdb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Mon Oct 22 10:46:33 CDT 2018 (crt) |
|
Filing 4
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/19/2018) (edm)
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (edm) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (edm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Audita Querela filed by Joshua Allen Baggett. (criminal case no. 4:12-cr-45-A(5)) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (edm) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3,4. Fri Oct 19 13:31:09 CDT 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baggett v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joshua Allen Baggett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ |
| Represented By: | Lindsey E Beran-DOJ |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
