Hunter v. USA
Petitioner: Charles Hunter
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2018cv00873
Filed: October 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: By January 22, 2019, the United States Attorney shall file and serve an answer complying with the provisions of Rule 5(b) of the Rules Governing 2255 Cases; and By February 5, 2019, movant shall file and serve any reply he wishes to make to such answer. (copy of this order and #11 Amended Motion placed in AUSA box) (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/21/2018) (mpw)
December 21, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Fri Dec 21 15:19:02 CST 2018 (crt)
December 20, 2018 Filing 11 AMENDED MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 against USA filed by Charles Hunter. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Amended Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The court ORDERS that movant's motion be, and is hereby, granted, and that movant be, and is hereby, granted an extension of time until December 17, 2018, in which to file his memorandum in support of his 2255 motion. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/10/2018) (mpw)
December 10, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File Amended Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Charles Hunter. (mpw)
December 10, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Mon Dec 10 16:56:42 CST 2018 (crt)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The court ORDERS that movant's #3 motion for leave to file extra length brief be, and is hereby, denied. The court further ORDERS that movant's #2 memorandum filed with his motion be, and is hereby, stricken from the record and unfiled. The court will hold movant's 2255 motion in abeyance for thirty days to allow him an opportunity to file a compliant memorandum. Otherwise, the court will proceed to consider the 2255 motion alone. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/6/2018) (bdb)
November 6, 2018 Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by USA re: #3 MOTION for Extra Length Brief. (mpw)
November 6, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Tue Nov 6 14:28:02 CST 2018 (crt)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Now pending is the motion of movant, Charles Hunter, for leave to file extra length brief in support of his motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody. The court finds that it would be helpful to have a response from the government. The court ORDERS that by 4:00 p.m. on November 2, 2018, United States file a response to movant's motion for leave. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/25/2018) (mpw)
October 25, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Thu Oct 25 14:02:44 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/24/2018) (bdb)
October 24, 2018 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb)
October 24, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Extra Length Brief filed by Charles Hunter. (bdb)
October 24, 2018 Filing 2 ***UNFILED AND STRICKEN PER #8 ORDER*** Memorandum in Support filed by Charles Hunter re #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (bdb) Modified on 11/6/2018 (bdb).
October 24, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 4:16-cr-028-A) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb)
October 24, 2018 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to Judge McBryde. (bdb)
October 24, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Wed Oct 24 16:40:19 CDT 2018 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunter v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Wes Hendrix-DOJ
Represented By: Leigha A Simonton-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?