Brown v. USA
Petitioner: Brian Matthew Brown
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2018cv00951
Filed: November 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Extend Time to File Response/Reply. Movant granted extension to 2/11/2019. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 1/15/2019) (wrb)
January 15, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. cy to Brown Tue Jan 15 15:26:00 CST 2019 (crt)
January 14, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to the United States' #6 Response to Pro Se Motion to Vacate filed by Brian Matthew Brown (wrb)
December 28, 2018 Filing 6 RESPONSE filed by USA re: #1 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255,, (wrb)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order to Show Cause, Notice, and Instructions to Parties. The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the motion and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Wes Hendrix-DOJ for USA added. Show Cause Response due by 12/31/2018. By Jan 11 2019, movant shall file and serve any reply. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/29/2018) (wrb)
November 29, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. cy to Brown Thu Nov 29 10:31:14 CST 2018 (crt)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/28/2018) (wrb)
November 28, 2018 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wrb)
November 28, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to expand the record filed by Brian Matthew Brown (wrb)
November 28, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 4:16-cr-132-A) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wrb)
November 28, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. cy to Brown Wed Nov 28 15:33:17 CST 2018 (crt)
November 28, 2018 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to Judge McBryde. (wrb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian Matthew Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Wes Hendrix-DOJ
Represented By: Leigha A Simonton-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?