Bradford-Wilson v. Smile Brands et al
| Cassandra R. Bradford-Wilson |
| Jenny, Dr. Debra Coleman DDS, Smile Brands, Dr. Patel, Dawn Mathison, Monarch Dental, Dr. C.N. Depak and Dr. Sandra Horner DDS |
| 4:2018cv00968 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
FINAL JUDGMENT... The court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that the claims of plaintiff, Cassandra R. Bradford-Wilson, against defendants, Smile Brands, Monarch Dental, Sandra Horner, "C.N. Depak," Debra Coleman, "Jenny," Dawn Mathison, "Dr. Coleman," and "Dr. Patel," be, and are hereby, dismissed. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/20/2018) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 8
Memorandum Opinion and Order... Because Bradford-Wilson failed to allege facts demonstrating that this court has subject matter jurisdiction, this court finds that her claims should be dismissed. Therefore, The court ORDERS that Bradford-Wilson's claims against defendants, Smile Brands, Monarch Dental, Sandra Horner, "C.N. Depak," Debra Coleman, "Jenny, Dawn Mathison, "Dr. Coleman," and "Dr. Patel," be, and are hereby, dismissed. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/20/2018) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8,9. Thu Dec 20 13:35:09 CST 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cassandra R. Bradford-Wilson (wxc) |
|
Filing 6
Order and Notice of Deficiency: Cassandra R. Bradford-Wilson must address the following deficiency: A $400.00 filing fee was not paid nor has a request to proceed in forma pauperis been submitted.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 10 days. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/7/2018) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Dec 7 16:34:33 CST 2018 (crt) |
|
Filing 5
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/6/2018) (wxc)
|
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to staff attorney DK. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cassandra R. Bradford-Wilson (wxc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cassandra R. Bradford-Wilson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4,5. Thu Dec 6 16:51:15 CST 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
